this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
926 points (99.0% liked)

Privacy

31993 readers
689 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lienrag@mastodon.tedomum.net 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@retiolus

Nice !
Maybe that will allow them to get rid of their marketing habits !

[–] retiolus@lemmy.cat 3 points 5 months ago

Would be very nice, that's one reason I use Tuta and not Proton

[–] Templa@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago

We recently purchased the family plan even if it is quite expensive for a couple. Reading this of course made me feel better about it.

[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I was sketched out by their move to get rid of inactive free accounts, but this is nice to see. Really hate the idea that if I'm unplugged just for a bit I lose a ton of contacts.

[–] Librerian@beehaw.org 1 points 5 months ago

You need to be unplugged for 12 consecutive months for Proton to delete your account because of inactivity though, which seems fair for free tier accounts. A simple login is enough to prevent this, you do not need to send an email or whatever, simply log in once a year. You also get reminders sent to your recovery email before this happens. Data storage for inactive free tier accounts isn't free for Proton.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Not to rain on the parade, but as long as we allow the reality-sized hole that is non-profits owning for-profits, this isn’t something I can get terribly excited about.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›