I don't think anyone else has said this, so I shall.
What in the actual fuck.
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
I don't think anyone else has said this, so I shall.
What in the actual fuck.
This is so hard because every one of his arguments is wrong, but the worst thing is that he's arguing this at all.
i like how he sees the "consent problem" as just a communication thing. "if they could speak, they would be saying yes"
of all the hills to die on, why would anyone pick this one lmao
Because they want to fuck animals?
There's no animal I'm aware of that has a mental capacity beyond that of a child. We don't think children are capable of giving consent - are we clearing the way to legalise paedophilia too, or are there animals with the mental capacity to provide informed consent that only lack the ability to communicate that consent?
Spoiler: It's not a communication issue. If this technocratic psycho was more concerned with actually contemplating the morality of the question, and less focused on rearranging the insides of a parrot, his takes might be a little less monstrous.
Gotta wonder if that’s in any way related to how so many of those assholes have a hate-on for furries
holy mental gymnastics to make furries sound normal