this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
23 points (87.1% liked)

Right to Repair

1493 readers
126 users here now

Whether it be electronics, automobiles or medical equipment, the manufacturers should not be able to horde “oem” parts, render your stuff useless if you repair it with aftermarket parts, or hide schematics of their products.

I Fix It Repair Manifesto

Summary article from I Fix It

Summary video by Marques Brownlee

Great channel covering and advocating right to repair, Lewis Rossman

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have a Pixel 4a (with Calyx) for a few years already (start of 2021) and it's still going great. The battery is okay. Everything works nice. It's smooth. It runs everything perfectly fine.

This makes me glad to see that hardware wise this phone was really built to last, I can't even count how many times I dropped it so hard that I was scared to see the damage (which was always either nothing or a broken screen protector)

But software wise I'm screwed as security updates are already gone from Google and I only get the extended support from Calyx which will also end soon.

Now I'm forced to choose between having a phone that is insecure or buying a new one.

So thanks Google for the high quality hardware, but what's up with this software planned obsolescence??

I know this isn't exactly right to repair, but it also kind of is because if Google decided to ditch the 4a, they should be forced to open source the software so that the public can actually repair it.

I'm sure that some of their latest updates can be modified slightly to work for the 4a, but they don't care and for them this is a win-win since they don't have to maintian support and they get new customers who would otherwise be satisfied with an "old" phone.

What happened to the days when an old phone meant a phone that was already crumbling to pieces, and not a fully functional computer that is slightly older then a toddler?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca -4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

I have a Pixel 4a (with Calyx) for a few years already (start of 2021)

  1. That’s just a little over three years ago.

This is why I run with Apple. Because even though their repairability sucks even more than Android, they are built like tanks and they get six to seven years of full OS updates, and not just security patches.

And the security patches continue for another year or two after that.

Nothing else comes close. Sure, the big players in Android have now claimed five years of OS updates, but I was promised Android 13 with my Nokia 7.2, yet I am still on the original Android 11 that the phone came with - Nokia never even released 12, much less 13 for that model.

I will believe these vendors once they are actually pushing Android v.X+5 to a phone that launched with v.X.

[–] Rogue1633@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

New Google Pixels come with 7 years of security updates and 7 major Android updates. With GrapheneOS you generally geht all AOSP updates. https://grapheneos.org/faq#recommended-devices After that GrapheneOS offers 3 years of harm reduction updates https://grapheneos.org/faq#device-lifetime New Samsung devices (like the S24) also come with 7 years of security updates + 7 Android Version updates.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Get back to me when an Android phone that was released with Android 15 gets an OTA update from the manufacturer to Android 22.

My experience with the Nokia 7.2 (and a few others) leads me to strongly suspect that these “promises” are nothing more than pinkie swears from everyone short of Google itself.

load more comments (3 replies)