this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2024
728 points (96.4% liked)

Programmer Humor

19564 readers
847 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 137 points 4 months ago (12 children)

On the other hand, I don't think you should add those ever

[–] firelizzard@programming.dev 52 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Sure. But in a sane language doing something totally nonsensical like that is an error, and in a statically typed language it’s a compiler error. It doesn’t just silently do weird shit.

[–] jcg@halubilo.social 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What's a sane, dynamically typed language?

[–] firelizzard@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

I was trying to make a point without starting a flamewar that was beside the point. Personally I’d never choose a dynamically typed language for a production system. That being said, Python and Ruby complain if you try to add an array, dict/hashmap, string, or number to another (of a different type) so they’re certainly more sane than JavaScript.

[–] Lime66@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Any of them which are still strongly typed. Just because a language doesn't check for type errors before runtime doesn't mean it won't check at all

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)