this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
113 points (95.2% liked)
pics
19604 readers
373 users here now
Rules:
1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer
2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.
3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.
4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.
5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.
Photo of the Week Rule(s):
1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.
2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.
Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Crazy to think that this is totality, yet there's still so much light passing around, to create shadows and everything.
But maybe the shutter speed is quite low on these?
Edit: down votes. Please, I would love to know why this is a bad comment. Thank you.
Edit 2: title was confusing, now fixed π it was phrased in a way that made me think it was in the path of the total eclipse. But of course nowhere near it, in reality.
This is the entire building visible from this particular viewpoint and the shutter speed was around 1/250
I see, is that a lower shutter speed than in daylight, or almost the same?
Edit: wait, when you said totality, you just meant "the whole building"? Not as in a "total eclipse"?
Yep, as mentioned by others this is Alhambra in Spain. If it makes you feel better I was going to make a California joke about Alhambra being in LA, not OC, so it's not just you π
Haha okay good, that does help π
This was taken during the sunset, i would say itβs an ok shutter speed for a 35mm focal length
And fixed the title, sorry for the confusion
No problem, thanks for clearing it up! π