this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

OSR/NSR Tabletop Roleplaying Games

1008 readers
1 users here now

Whither Reddit? In the meantime, here’s a place to chat up old school revival (OSR) and new school revolution (NSR) style TTRPGs.

My name is Todd aka Hexed Press and I am the current caretaker (have I always been the caretaker?). Here are some other places to find me, if you are so inclined:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This was posted to my forums and I thought it was an important enough topic to deserve more attention:

What is this communities (sic) opinion on saving and potentially rehosting (breaking copyright) of RPG blogs, posts, etc. in the potential event of that contents host going down?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] copacetic@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Morally, the difference is for what purpose you rehost stuff. The great thing about archive.org is that it has a clear purpose of preservation. If someone does it on their homepage where they also sell other stuff, the purpose might be to increase traffic and sales, so the purpose becomes murky.

[–] HexedPress@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mentioned archive.org on my reply in the forum. I've never tried saving something to the archive. Does it handle threaded forum style discussions well? That might be one complication for saving at least some sorts of things.

[–] roflo1@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you expect when you ask " Does it handle threaded forum style discussions well?".

Luckily, it's really simple. It took me less than a minute to save this:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230710165305/https://forums.hexed.press/t/moral-and-legal-implications-of-rehosting-blogs-for-preservation/549

[–] ianboyte@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This was more to the effect of how to capture a thread that was (by the point the forums were defunct) several dozen pages long.

load more comments (2 replies)