Gaming

20015 readers

1011 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Metallinatus@lemmy.ml

peternile@lemmy.ml

201

Phil Spencer blames capitalism for games industry woes: 'I don't get [the] luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 7 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml

118 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Phil Spencer, you have the luxury to quit if you don’t like the things you’re being forced to do for money.

Or, you could use your influence to try and push things in a different direction.

But Phil Spencer, you will do neither. You’ll shut up and keep dribbling.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Seriously. Everyone gets the luxury of not having to run a profitable growing business. You didn't "have" to run that business at all.

[–] Silentiea@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

And I get that the business maybe "has" to be run that way, because of the way it exists in the economic system it exists in, but I'm definitely taking issue with the language he's employed here. He's not a prisoner being forced to run things this way.