this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
246 points (98.0% liked)

World News

38859 readers
2227 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 6 months ago (9 children)

Media is really going to try and spin abstaining from a nonbinding resolution as some courageous stand against Israel...

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

It's not non binding. Security council resolutions are binding.

America just lied and said it's non binding right after the resolution passed to cover for israel anyways. But it's not true.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 17 points 6 months ago (4 children)

So, it was a binding resolution for immediate ceasefire...

There's no ceasefire...

So how is it binding? Where's the enforcement?

Has any country even stopped aid to Israel because they're continuing their genocide?

Israel is still flagrantly breaking international law, which is more "binding" than any UN resolution

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wait the ceasefire wasn't honored? Serious question.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Not yet, and it was only supposed to last till 4/9...

So there's not a lot of time for it to go into effect, which was the whole point of "immediate".

That's what I mean. People want to make this seem like a huge deal, but even if it happens eventually, it won't last long.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)