this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
157 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

23 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (21 children)

Supporting free speech means allowing people you hate to talk too. Censor a Nazi one day, then the next day it's something your weird friend likes, then the next day it's something you like.

Everyone deserves a platform online, but they have to earn their audience. Censoring them is only going to make more people want to go to other platforms to hear and see what they have to say.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

The right to free speech is drawn from a US constitutional amendment, which says the US government can't censor speech, but it has nothing to do with private platforms like this, much less individual responses to Nazi rhetoric. Nobody owes hate speech a free platform.

[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But these private platforms have a liability shield. If they have a liability shield, they shouldn't be allowed to censor things.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

they shouldn't be allowed to censor things

I disagree, and so does US law. Abusive material shouldn't be spread just because it can be.

[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Illegal shit is already illegal. That's not what I was talking about.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You missed the point, but whatever, you don't get to force private platforms to host content, that's up to the owners.

[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If they get a liability shield, they shouldn't get to control what happens on their platform.

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quite a sentence. I guess that's where I'm going to stop taking you seriously.

[–] EmperorHenry@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

As if you ever took me seriously before.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)