this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
627 points (89.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7124 readers
1097 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 83 points 1 year ago (27 children)

Don’t blame me. I held my nose and voted for her. That was hard. I travelled to a neighboring state to canvass door to door for Bernie’s first campaign. I swore long ago that I would never vote for anyone who authorized the Iraq war, as she voted to do. And I happen to be LGBT, and she has never been much of an ally to us.

I set all that aside and voted for her.

There’s no feeling quite like giving up your dignity for absolutely nothing.

[–] RebelOne@lemm.ee 62 points 1 year ago (4 children)

My friends and I are all huge Bernie supporters. We still voted for Hillary. We weren't happy about it, but we voted. All the blame against Bernie supporters bothers me. It wasn't us... And to use Bernie as the scapegoat is hiding the real problems in the system and the idiotic choices the democratic party makes. She still won the popular vote. We voted. Gerrymandering sucks.

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago

It's hilarious because the amount of Hillary 08 supporters who voted McCain instead of Obama is much than Bernie supporters who voted Trump.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole "Bernie bro" thing was 90% astroturfing. I'm sure a few individuals hopped onto that artificial bandwagon, but I don't expect it was too many.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

It's funny because this was supposedly some huge movement and yet i never actually met any of them.

[–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Gerrymandering makes no difference in a presidential election.

[–] thoeb@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

It does when the gerrymandering leads to policies and practices that make voting more difficult.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The clumping of whole states into winner takes all buckets, and the way that can subvert the overall popular vote, is identical to the dynamic of the “gerrymandering” proper term usually used with regard to congressional districts. To correct someone like you just did requires ignoring the entire meaning of the word to uphold to a strict definition of the word.

[–] ira@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Even with a strict definition, gerrymandering is still absolutely a thing with presidential elections, with Dakota boundaries being drawn to break it into two states to give Republicans twice as many electoral votes.

[–] DekkerNSFW@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

It's technically not gerrymandering, but the electoral college is a very similar issue.

load more comments (22 replies)