this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2024
10 points (81.2% liked)
Lemmy Bread
880 readers
1 users here now
Community to gather your best bread recipes and answer questions bread related.
Rules:
- Be kind
- Must be bread or baking-related
- No SPAM, bots, trolls, or personal attacks
- No advertising posts
- Recipe, crumb pic, and source preferred
- No NSFW Content
- No photos of children
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Sure! When I bake my own, I've used the "king Arthur's" gf 1:1 mix. It's actually good, just a bit pricy.
King Arthur’s uses ‘cleaned’ wheat starch, supposed to be <20 ppm gluten.
This isn’t ok for many with wheat allergy or gluten intolerance that is not celiac.
I need you to substantiate this claim, as I'm not cool with throwing companies catering to my small community under the bus.
Note your wording: "they use 'cleaned' wheat starch" in response to "king Arthur 1:1 gf flour", which very clearly on their site does not reflect that in, so far as I can tell, any of their gluten free Pettys.
From the webpage for King Arthur’s GF Bread Flour:
I’m not in the US, and hadn’t been aware of the distinction between their bread flour (which does have wheat starch) and their 1:1.
So agree on that, and appreciate the clarification.
I keep on getting social media recommendations for recipes made with King Arthur and for an EU analogue that uses ‘cleaned’ wheat starch. It makes me concerned that these are so heavily promoted without any cautions.
But the King Arthur 1:1 is a rice and starch mix, not ideal given the risks of a high rice diet (arsenic & aflatoxins) which we can’t mitigate as consumers when we have no idea where the rice is grown or how harvested, dried or processed. And rice heavy mixes produce dry baked goods as a rule, that go stale quickly. Can’t recommend it.
I’m going to respectfully argue back that it’s not helpful for the community when name brands with market power like King Arthur’s take up so much of the supermarket GF shelf space with problematic mixes. In doing so, they crowd out space that might let be given to newer GF producers with better products that eliminate gluten and other allergens for a larger group of consumers. I’ve been baking GF for about 25 years and have seen availability actually go down as some of the major brands have rolled into the segment. So, can’t really send kudos for that.
I feel strongly about Bob’s Red Mill in this regard as well by the way. We don’t know what the second generation management will do, but up to now Bob’s has dominated shelf space while refusing to separate its lines to eliminate other major allergens like milk, soy or tree nuts.
Prior to the FDA requirements on top allergen labeling going up in the US, we regularly saw our Canadian Food Inspection Agency pulling Bob’s products from shelves here based on lab findings of undeclared allergens. So, stores were wary to rely on Bob’s, but more recently Bob’s has displaced a number of better smaller mills on supermarket shelves.
As it happens, King Arthur’s flour isn’t available for sale in Canada while most other GF brands from the US are. King Arthur wheat flour was my favourite brand in the US when I was a student there many years ago, so I’ve been curious to see what they did for GF. Was pretty shocked when I looked it up to see a wheat-derived bread flour hitting the mass market under a GF label.
Wow, I'd never imagine anyone being so brave...
I recall Mike's hard lemonade going through a similar flaming hoop years back when they'd attempted to show their wheat -derived malt liquor was processed to pass the Elisa5 standard.
Here's a cool infographic: