this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
134 points (98.6% liked)

Astronomy

4006 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 8 points 8 months ago (6 children)

Isn't that too far for habitable zone?

[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (5 children)

That's the zone for liquid water at the planet surface. There's other sources of heat; gravitational pressure, geothermal vents from plate tectonics, etc. In this case they're looking for methane with a chemical signature that indicates it comes from geothermal activity as opposed to other processes that generate methane.

[–] Andrenikous@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

So that's also studies by astrobiologists looking at atmospheric methane because we know it can be created in large quantities by metabolism in an organism in addition to non organic processes, and in the atmosphere it reacts to sunlight so it needs to be replaced to stay present in large quantities.

This is something different where they're looking for chemical signatures, primarily methane, indicating geothermal vents which we've seen providing the energy to sustain life on earth at the bottom of the ocean. If abiogenesis requires some non organic processes like sublimation, evaporation, heating up and cooling down, etc to allow a self repeating process to start and continue to hold form until it's able to use sugars to continue to maintain itself instead of depending on its environment to kick start the life process then you'll want to look for those phase changes or boundaries like water/atmosphere or extreme heat/cold to provide the gradient that natural process may need like those studied in systems chemistry.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)