Not The Onion

12272 readers

1723 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

Links to news stories from...
...credible sources, with...
...their original headlines, that...
...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

kescusay@lemmy.world

639

Florida Cop Empties His Gun, Runs For Cover After Acorn Falls On Car and Mistakes It For Shots Fired (jalopnik.com)

submitted 9 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/nottheonion@lemmy.world

101 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I think I read that the noise reduction from a suppressor is actually pretty minimal, and it's still in the same "incredibly painfully loud" ballpark as a regular gunshot

[–] Tabs@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Depends. As long as the bullet doesn't break the sound barrier, a gun can be made reasonably silent with a good suppressor, to the point where the sound of the semi-automatic mechanism operating is louder than the gunshot itself. If the bullet is supersonic, then it will still be painfully loud.

[–] joel_feila@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

They did test them on mythbusters.

For hand guns they work really well ans aren't much louder then a nail gun.

[–] Tabs@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

I've got a suppressed Ruger 10/22 (22LR) that's about as noisy as a stapler.