this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2024
132 points (97.1% liked)

Lemmy

12544 readers
107 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Currently, the Lemmy Project only uses Github for its repositories related to Lemmy’s development (e.g. Lemmy, Lemmy-UI). GitHub is a proprietary service, and it is owned by Microsoft. These facts open the door for a myriad of potential issues across the ecosystem, and community. I would like to clarify, though, that I don’t think that it would be a wise decision, currently, to remove Github as the primary location for development, but I would think that it would be a good move to mirror Lemmy’s repositories to a FOSS service (e.g. Codeberg). I personally would advocate for the use of Codeberg, as it is entirely open source, and non-profit, and they are currently working on implementing federation (through ActivityPub) – all these things, I think, align well with Lemmy’s role in the wider community, and its more general philosophy. In the future, I would ideally hope for a permanent move to such a service, but, in the meantime, I think it would, at the very least, be a wise, if not only benevolent, move.


I decided to post this here, as I felt that it didn't seem appropriate to post it as an issue in any of the Lemmy repos.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] THE_ANON@lemmy.ml 23 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (7 children)

Yea i always thought why every one was using microsofts github when it goes against their ethics and philosophy .

[–] uuhhhhmmmm@sh.itjust.works 27 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Codeberg and other alternatives are used by 2 people, if not more. If a repo is hosted on such unpopular service, potential contributors must register a new account. This is very frustrating if you want to report just one issue or make one pull request. Self-hosted repos are even worse.

This problem can be solved by implementing federation. GitLab, Gitea and Forgejo already working on it, but really slow.

[–] Shamot@jlai.lu 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Is there a problem with GitLab if used on gitlab.com? Would it be worse than GitHub?

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Still subject to a company’s will in the cloud. For something like this (not doing anything in a legal gray area) it’s probably fine, though. For now, places like GitLab know they’d dissolve their trust with the world in an instant if they fucked around with a legal projects code (and github knows this too).

I think the point is less worry about corpos and more about “let’s support FOSS since an actual alternative exists”.

[–] unionagainstdhmo@aussie.zone 3 points 10 months ago

Unfortunately gitlab.com have been really cutting back on features for even open source projects due to money problems

[–] inspxtr@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)