this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2023
524 points (97.5% liked)

internet funeral

6903 readers
1 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Godort@lemm.ee 92 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Honestly, this is not an unreasonable take for 1982.

The most recent home console would've been the Colecovision and the most popular arcade game would've been Donkey Kong.

The NES was still 3 years away and she likely never heard of any of the more narrative PC games of the time like Adventure or Zork.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 14 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, these days it's obvious that video games are the next logical step in media consumption. First we had audio. Then we had audio+video. Now we have audio+video+interaction. You can literally watch a movie inside of a video game, if you care to.

But back then, the audio and video qualities of games weren't yet terribly developed. You could still easily find board games, or heck, sports, that were more complex than Pac-Man and Space Invaders.
I can definitely see that one would think, it's a novelty and not be able to imagine how cineastic games would become, or that some even contain books worth of history lessons.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Except the greatest educational game of all time was already ten years old and dead from dysentery by the time she was speaking.

I think it's more a case of her certainty coming from a lack of knowledge about the subject and the assumption that because she doesn't know about it that it doesn't exist.

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

I mean, yeah, I am also assuming that she was no expert on the matter. We're saying that it was an understandable opinion for a lay person or even someone who kept up with the bigger titles. It certainly wasn't easy back then to know about all kinds of games...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)