Reddit Migration

33 readers

1 users here now

### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/

founded 1 year ago

251

Reminder: reddit may be dead, but trolls are not. (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by drumdonuttea@kbin.social to c/RedditMigration@kbin.social

153 comments fedilink hide all child comments

As we start to see more users join, it's inevitable to see trolls (especially low-effort trolls) making more of an appearance and trying to be controversial and noticed.

Best just to scroll past them. They want to spark unwinnable arguments and rack up negative rep. If something seems absurdly ridiculous or inciteful, just move on. It's not even worth down voting.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] MonsieurHedge@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (39 children)

Hope the moderation gets more aggressive soon, or this place is fuuuucked. There's already like three the_donald magazines.

[–] Bradamir@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago (38 children)

Opposing political opinions are not trolls. Let's not be like Reddit where "opposite opinion" = bad.

[–] Helvedeshunden@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The_Donald was not about political opinions. It was a hate farm that made neofascists out of people who came for the lulz. By all means let's have actual conservatives discuss politics as a counterpoint to more liberal views, but smack the fascists down - because it's the only way to truly have a tolerant society and civil discourse: Intolerance as politics must not be tolerated. If that basic rule is ignored, everything else fails.

See the paradox of intolerance.

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I really like this interpretation of the Paradox of Intolerance:

The Paradox of Tolerance disappears if you look at tolerance, not as a moral standard, but as a social contract.
If someone does not abide by the contract, then they are not covered by it.
In other words: The intolerant are not abiding by the terms of the social contract of mutual tolerance. Since they have broken the terms of the contract, they are no longer covered by the contract, and their intolerance should NOT be tolerated.

Link to source.

[–] C4RP3_N0CT3M@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if the US applied this to illegal immigrants. Mmm.....so tolerant.

[–] Metaright@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

That does seem like a more reasonable way to think about it.

[–] Metaright@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That "paradox" is bunk and is only good for justifying censorship.

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's good for getting rid of antisocial shit heads who feel like they're entitled to an audience for their toxic or abusive ideas and beliefs.

Because that's exactly what it speaks to.

Now, if you want to argue with Karl, might I recommend getting a PhD in philosophy and starting from there, rather than whining on the internet?

[–] Metaright@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Are you saying that disagreement with this person is not legitimate unless you have the same level of education?

load more comments (35 replies)