this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
136 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

23 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

It looks like Google are pushing pretty hard on AdBlockers now. Looks like a pretty aggressive new UI from them.

I'm finding revanced for Android is still working well, but I've got no idea when that'll become less reliable

adblock

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nicman24@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] SpaceCadet2000@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sure it does. Technically, it's perfectly feasible to put up an ad-wall.

[–] nicman24@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

show me one example that DRM ever worked for streaming services and wasn't immediately cracked

[–] SpaceCadet2000@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I get the feeling we are now talking about two different things. If by "cracked" you mean that someone can rip and redistribute the content once they get access to it, sure, it's very hard to protect against that.

What I mean is: it's possible to restrict access to the service so that you cannot watch a video unless you've played the ad first or you are a paying customer. As an example: Netflix or any of the movie streaming platforms. There's no add-on or special browser that allows you to use Netflix without being a paying customer, and if YouTube implements their plan, they can make it so you won't be able to circumvent it just by using Firefox, like you claimed.