Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54577 readers

269 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

sunbrothersco@lemmy.dbzer0.com

dataprolet@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com

RandomLegend@lemmy.dbzer0.com

400

Louis Rossman/FUTO's YouTube app, GrayJay, now supports Sponsorblock... and shames you if you use it (lemmy.ca)

submitted 1 year ago by bionicjoey@lemmy.ca to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

190 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Seriously this was very surprising. I've been experimenting with GrayJay since it was announced and I largely think it's a pretty sweet app. I know there are concerns over how it isn't "true open source" but it's a hell of a lot more open than ReVanced. Plus, I like the general design and philosophy of the app.

I updated the YouTube backend recently and to my surprise and delight they had added support for SponsorBlock. However, when I went to enable it, it warned me "turning this on harms creators" and made me click a box before I could continue.

Bruh, you're literally an ad-blocking YouTube frontend. What kind of mental gymnastics does it take to be facilitating ad-blocking and then at the same time shame the end-user for using an extension which simply automates seeking ahead in videos. Are you seriously gonna tell me that even without Sponsorblock, if I skip ahead past the sponsored ad read in a video, that I'm "harming the creator"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yes but you watching the ad doesn't make money for the creator.

[–] neeeeDanke@feddit.de -1 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Ot does if its a good ad / sales pitch and I actually buy the product which is not gonna happen if it is automatically skipped.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This is such a bizarre concept to me.

Why would I want someone to convince me to buy something with a "good pitch" ?

[–] neeeeDanke@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because I didn't know of it before?

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you didn't know of it, then you didn't need or want it.

[–] neeeeDanke@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's just false. For example I didn't know Nebula existed before all those sponsored segments on the creators videos but I like the service now and am happy I got it...

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I guess there are exceptions, it's unknowable but one wonders how long it would've taken you to discover nebula some other way.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)