this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
391 points (91.2% liked)

World News

39023 readers
2368 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] avater@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (10 children)

From a tactical perspective it is. A ceasefire would help the civilians but also would benefit the Hamas...it's a double edged sword.

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

From a tactical perspective it's a goddamn war crime. When should they stop, then? When no native Palestinian remains, so they can swoop in and take all of Gaza like they've been trying to do for the last 70 years? Hamas is a response to decades of ethnic cleansing and Israel is using it as an excuse to further their conquest

Edit: this isn't necessarily directed at OP. It's more of an open ended question for those in support of the bombings

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

As far as international law goes no this is not a war crime.

If your military takes refuge or uses a civilian center for military operation then that location becomes a valid military target regardless of the risk to civilian lives.

Basically Hamas is commiting the crime by purposefully setting up in these areas. Once they do that then civilian death is acceptable collateral damage, legally speaking.

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about bombing humanitarian aide locations or using white phosphorus as a weapon?

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same thing applies to humanitarian aid.

If Hamas has hijacked or is operating in those places then they become military targets.

As far as white phosphorus, it depends on how it's deployed. If it's deployed for masking, tracing or identifying then it's legal.

If it's being directly used as an incendiary then that's illegal.

[–] CaptFeather@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The point I'm making is both of those situations happened (good banks got bombed immediately after the convoy left and they have been using white phosphorus on people) and people are just looking the other way.

[–] galloog1@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The news media made the same claims against the US concerning white phosphorous and that was not true so my burden of proof concerning white phosphorous is so high it actually supports the opposing narrative without some damn good evidence.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)