United States | News & Politics

7212 readers

401 users here now

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

pangyuehung@lemmy.ml

yogthos@lemmy.ml

465

California Schools Will Require Students to Learn to ID Fake News, Misinformation | KQED (www.kqed.org)

submitted 1 year ago by DevCat@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml

42 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Pushing back against the surge of misinformation online, California will now require all K-12 students to learn media literacy skills — such as recognizing fake news and thinking critically about what they encounter on the internet.

Gov. Gavin Newsom last month signed Assembly Bill 873, which requires the state to add media literacy to curriculum frameworks for English language arts, science, math and history-social studies, rolling out gradually beginning next year. Instead of a stand-alone class, the topic will be woven into existing classes and lessons throughout the school year.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] LethalSmack@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The problem was it forced you to agree with that opinion. There was no thinking involved, only blind belief

Critical thinking would allow you to understand opposing opinions while respectfully disagreeing

[–] Stumblinbear@pawb.social -4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

There was no thinking involved

I actually wholeheartedly disagree. It's easy to spout off your own beliefs, it's harder to justify one you don't already agree with. Critical thinking here would require you to understand where the article is coming from rather than writing it off entirely because you start from a position of not agreeing.

Understanding an opinion while not agreeing with it is incredibly important. If you don't understand a topic well enough to advocate for the devil, then you don't understand it enough to have a conversation at all.

This is literally what critical thinking is. It's not "justify a position you already agree with."

[–] LethalSmack@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I disagree. You are only allowed to agree with the article using the articles own statements. If article states the sky was always red without mentioning anything else, then you’d have to agree or fail.

No other views, facts, opinions, perspectives, etc was allowed.

That is not critical thinking.

That was how Missouri taught “critical thinking”

load more comments (2 replies)