this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
22 points (89.3% liked)
Celebs
0 readers
1 users here now
Pictures, gifs, and videos of female celebrities
Rules:
- The title must be only the full name of the celebrity
- no comments, no numbers, no descriptions, etc.
- Flag NSFW content
- this includes nudes, bras, panties, underwear, swimsuits, bikinis, obscene poses, etc.
- if in doubt, flag it
- Post only famous ladies
- no men, no self-promotions
- generally speaking, this is a community of internationally-recognized women
- Leakes/Fake is forbidden
- As of now, all Paparazzi's content is still allowed
- No screenshots with UI clutter
- please post original images without borders, watermarks, logos, etc.
NOTES:
- If you are not logged in, you can't see NSFW posts
- Make sure to enable "Show NSFW content" in your settings
- Make sure to keep both "English" and "Undetermined" in your allowed languages
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
She's obviously free to no longer dress provocatively, but demanding that photos she has publicly released no longer be viewed, or viewed only under certain conditions, is ridiculous.
People saying that to her, whether she was asking them to stop or not, is completely inappropriate. But we live in a world of 8 billion people, the vast majority of which have internet access. Unfortunately there will always be a few weirdos saying creepy shit.
That said, she's a public figure who released these photos publicly. As I said, it is ridiculous to demand that these photos only be viewed when certain conditions are met. For this reason I feel it would be absurd to comply with her demands and in so doing encourage this sort of mentality.