this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
1289 points (98.1% liked)

memes

10322 readers
2118 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nevoic@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't know if your second to last paragraph is a meme, but all humans reject immoral behaviors that occur in the wild, not just vegans. Lions also commit infanticide so their genetics carry on and competing male lions don't, it makes sense biologically. Yet humans don't commit this behavior because we know it's wrong. Dolphins rape other dolphins, which again for the furthering of your own genetics makes sense. You should implant your seed in as many helpless victims as you can, and yet again, humans don't do this because we know it's wrong.

Pretending like vegans are the weird ones because we're simply consistent about our morality is wild. Non-vegans even get upset at the idea of eating dogs or cats, so it's not even like they're universally in favor of torturing and slaughtering helpless animals, only the ones that have been objectified by whatever culture they live in.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Weird and wrong. These are extremely subjective.... Same with good or bad.

I'm sure the gazelle thinks it's bad to be killed and eaten, I'm sure they think it's wrong. The Lions who hunted it down and ate it think it's good and the right thing to do.

This is entirely subjective. The universe doesn't have an absolute of good, bad, right, wrong, weird, or normal. It simply is. Anything that is good/bad or right/wrong is a matter of opinion and perspective.

Only humans attribute their system of right and wrong to animals that may be entirely okay with the matters at hand. We don't impose our laws and values into animals just as they cannot impose their morals and values on us. To judge them for the actions that they take without being able to understand their thoughts and feelings on those matters is juvenile.

You simply cannot transpose human notions of right and wrong into situations where humans have no say, no context, and no understanding of the social constructs of those species.

I'm sorry that you don't like it, but I promise that the animals you're referring to, see it differently than you.

We don't understand it, and maybe we never will. Let them do their thing and if there's ever a time where we can adequately communicate with those animals and ask them how they feel about what's happening, then at that point, maybe we can take action for or against it as appropriate.

Until then, let them live the way they choose to live. Let them sort out their own problems as we have been trying to do for humanity.

[–] Nevoic@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Normative truths are just as foundational as descriptive truths. You use the same logic to get there. I hope you're intelligent enough to be an epistemological nihilist, so hopefully you know the basis for all scientific and descriptive understanding of the universe is self-evident axioms. The same is true for moral truths. Harm is axiomatically bad in the same way that our senses are accurately able to translate information of an external universe into our brains.

If you disagree with the former, we can't have moral discussions, and if you disagree with the latter we can't have scientific discussions. This is how the whole of epistemology functions.

You're also strawmanning me. Ought implies can, so an animal without an ability to act morally obviously has no moral obligations. I hope you somehow just severely misunderstand the vegan position, and you're not intentionally spreading misinformation.

Factory farms aren't us allowing them to sort out their own problems. We spawn billions of sentient creatures into torture boxes every year just to slaughter them when they're a few months old in brutal and terrifically painful ways.

If you think that's awesome, keep buying meat, more power to you, you're just probably a psychopath (though I obviously can't give you an official diagnosis).

[–] SciRave@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Least obvious phillosophy major.