this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
15 points (89.5% liked)

College Football

842 readers
8 users here now

A community to discuss college football.

Find your team's community

Join the Fanaticus Discord

Vote in the community poll

/c/CFB Poll Top 25 Fanaticus
1. Oregon Oregon
2. Ohio State Ohio State
3. Indiana Indiana
4. Texas Texas
5. Notre Dame Notre Dame
T-6. Ole Miss Mississippi
T-6. Tennessee Tennessee
8. Penn State Penn State
9. Alabama Alabama
10. BYU BYU
11. Miami Miami
12. SMU SMU
13. Georgia Georgia
14. Boise State Boise State
15. Army Army
16. Texas A&M Texas A&M
17. Clemson Clemson
18. South Carolina South Carolina
19. Washington State Washington State
20. Colorado Colorado
21. Louisville Louisville
22. Tulane Tulane
23. Kansas State Kansas State
T-24. Iowa State Iowa State
T-24. LSU Louisiana State

Check out our other sports communities!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] g0d0fm15ch13f@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

So THAT'S the secret to a dominant d...

Also for what it's worth sign stealing has always been an interesting topic for me. Let's say you as a player notice that every time the rb lines up somewhere the ball goes to him, so you start to play based on that. That seems fine to me. And let's say as a coach you notice a certain percent of their plays in previous games are in a certain package, so you gameplan for that. Again seems fine. But sign stealing is just a logical extension of those two things. I don't think I actually support sign stealing, but it's just curious that I can't actually criticize it.

[–] TheAndrewBrown@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

There are rules about attending practices in person or using electronic devices to aid in sign stealing. But if you just notice your opponent using a specific sign and it correlating certain plays or schemes, that’s just part of the game. It’s a team’s responsibility to obfuscate their signs, otherwise why use signs at all? If you weren’t allowed to see what the sideline is signaling to the players, just hold the play name up on a card, then you could save time teaching kids the signals.

I’m guessing the investigation is more to make sure they didn’t use one of the outlawed methods, and I’m willing to bet they didn’t and just got pretty good at figuring out signs. Or are just good enough that teams think that’s what they’re doing.

load more comments (7 replies)