this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
154 points (94.3% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2948 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

So... setting aside the source of this explosive for a moment (because there's a lot of speculation and no firm answer yet), can we all agree that there's no way this killed 500 people? The impact crater is about the size of a sewer manhole (there's one near it in the panorama image in the article).

The initial reporting on this was sensationalized to generate outrage and sympathy.

[–] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest -1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Video of the aftermath. It's horrific. ~500 is accurate. When half of them are children it doesn't take up as much space as you think.

spoilerSeriously, don't click unless you're ok seeing a lot of dead kids https://twitter.com/LocalFocus1/status/1714340397298733479

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Right, so, this video is addressed in the article:

A video posted on Twitter on Tuesday night showed a grassy area adjacent to the hospital covered with dead bodies. At least two dozen bodies are visible in this video. Bellingcat is not linking to the video due to its graphic nature.

Did you read the article?

Not to quibble, but two dozen != 500. The difference is significant because of the effect it has had on reporting on the incident.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'd understand if you tried defending 50, but 500?

[–] qdJzXuisAndVQb2@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

500 shows such bad faith, get real.

[–] hassanmckusick@lemmy.discothe.quest -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's one thing to argue who did it because none of us are sure and "evidence" points in both directions but y'all are fucking monsters if you're going to try and downplay the scale of the violence with absolutely no evidence.

[–] norbert@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Almost as monstrous as using large, vague numbers with absolutely no evidence?

Ohh yeah the doctors on location picking up body parts everywhere def have no evidence.

[–] dumdum666@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The video is horrific indeed - but fortunately (!) way less than than the first reported amount of people died. It is hard to really count but in the video itself it seem that less than 50 dead are shown. We don’t know if every casualty was filmed though.

The tweet itself still blames Israel for this, so the source doesn’t even pretend to be neutral/news.

load more comments (14 replies)