this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
18 points (95.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40251 readers
857 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi there!

I'm trying to set up two services (through docker) both of which use port 8080 by default. However I am wanting these to services to sit behind a VPN using Gluetun. I added both of the ports I want to use to the compose file, but this just leads to only one of the services working as the other one will say "port already in use". How can I strictly tell these services what port they shall use in the compose file?

This is how I did it so far;

docker-compose.yml

***
version: '3'
services:
  vpn:
   image: qmcgaw/gluetun:latest
   container_name: vpn
   restart: unless-stopped
   cap_add:
    - NET_ADMIN
   environment:
      - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
      - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_IP=####
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_PORT=####
      - WIREGUARD_PUBLIC_KEY=####
      - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=####
      - WIREGUARD_PRESHARED_KEY=####
      - WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES=####
   devices:
    - /dev/net/tun:/dev/net/tun
   ports:
    - '8080:8080'
    #VPN
    - 8888:8888/tcp
    - 8388:8388/tcp
    - 8388:8388/udp
    - 8000:8000/tcp
    - 8584:8584
    - 8585:8585
   volumes:
    - /docker/appdata/gluetun:/gluetun
  sabnzbd:
    image: lscr.io/linuxserver/sabnzbd:latest
    container_name: sabnzbd
	network_mode: container:vpn
    volumes:
      - /docker/appdata/sabnzbd/data:/config
    restart: unless-stopped
  qbittorrent:  
    container_name: qbittorrent  
    image: linuxserver/qbittorrent:latest
    restart: unless-stopped
    network_mode: container:vpn  
    volumes:  
     - /docker/appdata/qbitorrent:/config  
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Just use a different port number. I'm not sure why it's necessary to use the same one since you can change qbittorrent's port in the config files.

[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can also map different ports to the container. For sake of argument lets say qtorrent had a fixed port you cannot change, that’s just what the application listens to. You can then map a different container port to that application port.

tldr, OP, you can’t have two containers in docker on the same container port

[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but OPs problem can be solved by changing a 0 to a 1 in a single file.

[–] Fjor@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)