this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2023
559 points (97.1% liked)

> Greentext

7548 readers
4 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ilovethebomb@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is a problem a few "dystopian" Sci Fi publications have, they're often better than what we have now.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The tech is usually better, but that just kind of comes with the genre.

[–] wombatula@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah it literally wouldn't be sci fi without the sci, with the edge case of post-apocalypse scenarios aside, it would be kind of hard to do a sci fi without better tech. In fact aside from post-apocalypse or older outdated sci fi, I literally cannot think of any property we would call sci fi that doesn't have better tech.

[–] SterlingVapor 2 points 1 year ago

There's always the ones where AI are always omnicidal and all digital tech is taboo, or the ones that predate the information age where you have very manual but powerful tech... Like sure, FTL is definitely sci-fi, but without automation (even human guided automation like ripperdocs) you end up with very unequal societies where magic tech exists, but only for the rich or large organizations

The first is a newer genre so I can't think of anything well known, the second includes things like the time machine where the time machine is sci-fi, but technology regresses, and the last one could be things like dune. Or 1984, where we've surpassed the "futuristic" tech (and unfortunately was mostly used like a how-to guide in recent years)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)