this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
675 points (93.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
37 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (18 children)

    because it's so easy ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ

    [โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (17 children)

    How is it easier then any other distro

    [โ€“] techognito@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (15 children)

    Compared to say arch, gentoo, lfs. ubuntu is easier to install, but I believe the point you wanted to make is that there are distros that are as easy if not easier to install than ubuntu

    edit: I see now that this might have sounded more condescending than I had intended, and for that I'm sorry.

    The point I wanted to make was that there are both better and worse installers out there. Which is something I enjoy about linux and the different distros. You have the option to install something easy and just use your computer as you see fit, or you can tinker and learn different ways your computer can be set up.

    [โ€“] butre@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    you can't convince me that anyone is actually using lfs in 2023. tinkering with it maybe, and I can see someone doing alfs for specialized shit, but there's no way in hell anyone is actually using it as their regular daily driven os on their personal computer. it just doesn't make sense.

    real people outside of the ubuntu space are using debian, fedora, manjaro, maybe something like pop os or mint. there's no barrier to entry, performance difference is negligible if present at all, and you don't have to spend a full day getting it ready

    [โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    The only real difference I can think of is that Ubuntu's installer is actually really nice and had the dual boot install option, which I don't think any other distro has.

    [โ€“] butre@ani.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    most distros that aren't like slackware/gentoo/arch/etc. install with calamares these days, it handles dual boot configs simply and without issue. even doing like debian netinst, I don't remember it having any trouble

    [โ€“] mojo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    In terms of ease of use, no. They're capable, but in Ubuntu it's literally as easy as choosing how much space do you want to leave for Windows and Ubuntu, then it handles all the partitioning for you.

    [โ€“] butre@ani.social 2 points 1 year ago

    it's been years since I bothered with windows I'll admit, but I'm fairly certain calamares handles it all for you too

    load more comments (13 replies)
    load more comments (14 replies)
    load more comments (14 replies)