this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
45 points (97.9% liked)

Australia

3616 readers
73 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

To save you a click:

Mr White says part of the problem is there are still many public misunderstandings around phones and driving.

"A good example is the view that if you're using a hands-free phone — if you've got it in a cradle — then that's taking the risk away. And that's not true," he says.

"There's plenty of scientific evidence that says the level of distraction, using a phone hands-free or hand-held, is exactly the same. It doesn't change."

[–] Edgelord_Of_Tomorrow@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But one of these is legal and the other is not, why is that?

[–] samson@aussie.zone 7 points 1 year ago

The level of distraction is one thing, but the level of dexterity is different. It's a lot easier to drive straight looking at a phone (or even interacting with one) that's in a cradle.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)