this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
463 points (95.7% liked)

Technology

34830 readers
17 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 30 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Just because something is unique doesn’t mean it’s valuable.

Some people are just discovering this.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Try telling that to sports memorabilia collectors though.

"Look at my hockey jersey!" "Yeah, so? I have the same one." "Yeah but you're wasn't signed by Wayne Gretsky."

Or even trading cards, or comics. Or hell, even plain w-shirts with a brand logo on it for $250. People assign arbitrary values to stuff all the time. I don't understand it at all, but there's a whole ton of people that just eat that shit up like it's candy.

That arises at least somewhat more organically around a real interest that millions of people have been enjoying and obsessing over for generations. So it's not fair to say it's totally arbitrary.

The logo stuff is weird though. That's definitely more "Veblen" like the high price point is itself a flex and desire for, if not true luxury, then the appearance of opulence.

[–] devils_advocate@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

However NFTs were trying to assign value to the receipt for the Gretzky shirt.

[–] BaconIsAVeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well no, in my example the shirt is the image and the signature on it is the NFT bit. Physically, it's just a bit of ink, but the shirt itself is no different than one you can go pickup at the store.

[–] devils_advocate@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

In your example what happens if the shirt is sold to someone else? In the NFT case the signature changes.

The shirt analogy doesn't work well, but NFTs are great for transferable tickets.

load more comments (6 replies)