this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
17 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
297 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

I have been banging the drum about increased investment in public housing for years now. Public housing has a bad reputation among some because the Projects in the USA which were not well done. But Vienna, Austria has been showing us how to build desirable public housing that both wealthy and poor want to live in, while solving a raft of social issues along the way.

[–] justhach@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

As someone who works in public housing, one of the issues I see is that it's a place for people we want to forget about. There's a lot of mental health/social issues with our tenants because we're basically the last step before homelessness. We get their welfare/disability penion/social support direct deposited in our account to cover rent, stick them in an apartment, and forget about them.

Its hard for your average joe to want to live in subsidized housing, even with the cheaper rent, when he has to worry about an untreated schizophrenic running down the halls at 3 am banging on doors, or horders causing cockroach, bed bug, anf rodent issues, or finding needles and crack pipes in the stairwell.

In most living situations, this would result in eviction, but since our mandate is to keep people housed, we tend to accept that it comes with the territory.

What we really REALLY need is a robust social services network to not only house people, but treat them so that they can self actualize and actively participate in society.

But we're not too interested in doing that, because if we dont have these dregs of society, what else to we have to threaten the middle class to keep them in line?

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree with these issues but I think a lot of this comes from our current conception of what public housing can be. In Vienna, something like 60+% of all housing stock is public in nature. It's not a place to stick the least fortunate among us, but the primary means of housing people. If we can make that sort of conceptual leap, it would go a long way towards solving our housing woes, I think.

[–] rosatherad@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This country could be so much better. Fingers crossed that social services and housing are improved like that by the time I retire.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Check out M. Moneybags over here, with retirement plans. Social services for retirement, hah! We get MAID and consider ourselves lucky to have it.

[–] rosatherad@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I'm quite the opposite of a moneybags, I just like to dream. :(

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)