this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
98 points (99.0% liked)

DACH - jetzt auf feddit.org

8713 readers
1 users here now

Diese Community wird zum 01.07 auf read-only gestellt. Durch die anhäufenden IT-Probleme und der fehlende Support wechseln wir als Community auf www.feddit.org/c/dach - Ihr seid herzlich eingeladen auch dort weiter zu diskutieren!

Das Sammelbecken auf feddit für alle Deutschsprechenden aus Deutschland, Österreich, Schweiz, Liechtenstein, Luxemburg und die zwei Belgier. Außerdem natürlich alle anderen deutschprechenden Länderteile der Welt.

Für länderspezifische Themen könnt ihr euch in folgenden Communities austauschen:

Eine ausführliche Sidebar findet ihr hier: Infothread: Regeln, Feedback & sonstige Infos

Auch hier gelten die Serverregeln von https://feddit.de !

Banner: SirSamuelVimes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fernseh-Meteorologen kämpfen um die Wahrheit: Weil sie über die Zusammenhänge von Wetter und Klimakrise aufklären, sehen sie sich immer häufiger Angriffen von Wissenschaftsleugnern ausgesetzt.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] intelati@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (10 children)

English "Everything" user here. Sorry.

Liters/meter^2

Is this a common unit for weather? I translated the post text and the climate/drought makes sense.

I just haven't ever seen the USA national weather service use the volume over area units like that. Mostly like a depth measurement.. X inches short of typical rainfall insert timeframe here..

I guess dimensionally it's the same, it just hits differently IMO?

[–] shrippen@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe the us national weather service just assumes a volume and doesn't say it? They kinda have to. If you say it rained x inches of rain in that hour, how do you know in what area? X inches over the whole country? Or per city? Per square inch? They have to measure the rainfall over a certain volume over a certain time. Otherwise you wouldn't be able to compare it.

[–] cedeho@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You don't need the area to actually have a clue about the significance of a rain event. In the weather news you'll find expressions like "20 mm of rain". 20mm "water table" is the independent from the area as it means the same like 20mm/m² or 20mm/km².

You won't actually calculate the total amount of water (volume) coming down by multiplying it with the area of the rain event.

[–] notapantsday@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Inches or mm are a perfectly fine measurement for the amount of rain. Volume over area mathematically comes out as a unit of length.

It's a lot more intuitive with snow. If you get five inches of snow over night, there's no need for an area reference, because everything gets the same five inches of snow, no matter how big the area.

With rain it's the same, everything gets the same "height" of rain, even though it usually doesn't stay in place like the snow.

load more comments (7 replies)