this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
143 points (95.5% liked)

retrocomputing

4126 readers
8 users here now

Discussions on vintage and retrocomputing

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JoeHill@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Remember, this was way before Windows.

it’s 1994

Windows 3.1 came out in 1992. Yes you still were in DOS a lot back then, but it was hardly “way before windows”.

Speaking of just hunting for random stuff in DOS, my personal favorite “what’s this?” in DOS was Gorillas.bas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorillas_(video_game)?wprov=sfti1

[–] DosDude@retrolemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I agree, but Windows 3.x was more a shell on top of MSDOS and had a more niche market, and windows 95 didn't get most popular OS until late 1998. So for a lot of people that was way before windows. Also tech went a lot faster back then. Updates to an old system isn't as important if it's not connected to the world of online hackers.

[–] i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Windows 95 was also a shell on top of MSDOS. Windows NT wasn't running on top of DOS, but it was primarily for business use until Windows XP.

[–] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago

It's a bit more complicated than that. Windows 95 used MSDOS to boot, but once it was booted, it completely removed any trace of MSDOS and replaced it with its own MSDOS subsystem. It's more like MSDOS was a shell on top of Win95, but MSDOS was required to get the kernel loaded.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)