this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1320 points (97.3% liked)

Clever Comebacks

1181 readers
1 users here now

Posts of clever comebacks in response to someone.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing is allowed but when used to insult someone.
  2. Discussion is encouraged, but only in good faith. No arguing for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor names/identifying info of everyone who isn’t a public figure.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy this community in the light hearted manner it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 265 points 1 year ago (19 children)
[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (12 children)

If the charity itself is doing proper work, that makes sense tbh. I mean, if you had billions to donate, would you give it to some random ass organisation... Or set up your own thing to do things that you personally agree with?

[–] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I’d go for the middle option: donate to existing charities that appeal to me. I don’t want to run a charity, it sounds like a massive headache.

[–] Kelsenellenelvial@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re probably a different demographic. I’d guess the kind of people that become billionaires, assuming they actually want to be philanthropic, think that they can do a better job of managing their charities than existing charities would do managing their donations.

[–] SomeoneElseMod@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

It’s definitely fair to say I’m in the “extremely unlikely to ever be a millionaire, let alone a billionaire” demographic!

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)