this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2023
604 points (94.9% liked)

> Greentext

7547 readers
3 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blanketswithsmallpox@kbin.social 76 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

When you're already a millionaire but didn't want to cash out because turns out you just liked riding the gambling high rather than treat it as a job.

[–] Bipta@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Eh if you really believe in crypto it makes no sense to cash out, but every peak has shown that attitude of "this is when crypto will really go mainstream" was wrong.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

The value of the work done in the Blockchain must be tied to the value of the applications it supports. This was always the premise from day one. Originally, that application was supposed to be payment processing. A perfectly legitimate application, but one which comes with an interesting problem - it requires an external source of value. The value of a payment processing application can't be more than the value of the assets it can process. Also the Blockchain turned out to be pretty shit at it.

The speculative value of Bitcoin was always a paradox, and pretty obvious IMO. But cryptocurrency as collateral value for stake/work done in a distributed applications is legitimate, and some variant of it will eventually find some valuable application IMO. But those tokens will need to have stronger anti-speculation mechanisms built in.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)