this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
72 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7204 readers
371 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca/


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Do you want to kill the internet? This is how you kill the internet.

This is how you isolate your journalism industry to get zero traffic

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Seems like that would hurt Canadian journalism rather than kill the internet?

[–] Overzeetop@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The whole idea the internet is interlinked sites. Then again the whole idea if the internet was also a robust, reliable, multi-nodal, non-corporate architecture for redundant transmission of data, so we’re headed into the shitter already.

But, more to the point, if you start charging people for links you break the purpose of being able to link things. It will kill Canadian journalism first, but it will wound a portion of the internet in the process. And if it spreads it will do net harm to both sides, everywhere.

[–] karlhungus@lemmy.ca -2 points 1 year ago
  1. You already are charged by Google the price is your data and ads
  2. The target is 1 billion dollar + entities (based on my skim)

Just like the original comment this seems like wild overstatement.

load more comments (8 replies)