this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
1360 points (95.0% liked)

Memes

45614 readers
785 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Gnubyte@lemdit.com 13 points 1 year ago (13 children)

I'm thinking of moving to a state that's colder where I can buy land that has water within the property.

I also think to do anything sizeable you need the resources a company can bring. Our problems are at scale. You need a scaled resource pool and reinvestment in that to work up to some of the issues. I like the idea of carbon extraction for example, but I don't see any resources invested in it from US companies.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Carbon extraction isn't a viable solution until its whole area is running on green energy. With current technology, at least, running it on a green power source will make less of an impact than hooking that green power source up to replace some fossil fuels.

In other words, don't rely on heal spells until the battle's over. They'll never outpace incoming damage.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, as far as resource costs go, planting tree is more efficient at capturing carbon then any industrial scrubber. Research should still be done, but anyone trying to sell a scrubber plant is just fishing for VC funds.

[–] pedalmore@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

They're also typically embraced by fossil companies, selling both the disease and cure. If they can socialize the costs of sequestration they can keep drilling for profit. We are in desperate need of a carbon tax.

[–] Sotuanduso@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yes, I was going to mention trees too, but I wasn't sure of the impact.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)