this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
1009 points (81.1% liked)

Memes

45609 readers
1099 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Colour_me_triggered@lemm.ee 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

The problem is that a middle class, can only be a middle class if it's in between an upper class and a lower class. It's in the name: MIDDLE class.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

There will always be a distribution of wealth. The key thing is how broad that distribution is.

[–] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah, there's no problem with a meritocracy as long as the top and the bottom of the gradient aren't (literally can't pay bills -> more money than you could ever spend.)

Like in no sane world would people willingly become surgeons for the same pay as a sanitation worker, that's just fucking stupid. Why spend a decade going through school to be a doctor when you could just go pick up trash and make the same money? We have to have some kind of variation in pay scale or society wouldnt function.

Like you said, how much difference between the top and the bottom definitely doesn't have to be what it is.

[–] dessel@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah but in the current form of meritocracy both the surgeon and the sanitation worker are relatively poor compared to the upper class. And that exactly is the problem: you cant get rich just by working.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)