this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
1009 points (96.8% liked)

Memes

45686 readers
670 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Shard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Wait. Could Quantum ducks in a superposition state exist? And how would those be a duck or not?

[–] Kleysley@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This wouldnt work because if quantums are grouped together they lose their quantum properties. Thus a duck in a superposition can unfortunately not exist :)

[–] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Source? I'll continue to believe in my quantum super-duck until proven otherwise!

[–] Kleysley@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

There is no definite proof, there is also no definite proof that a quantum can even be in a superposition at all (in the sense od being in two states at once) becuae we cannot observe it. Physicist Niels Bohr for example believes that the outcome is already set long before we observe it.

[–] SaltyIceteaMaker@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Schrödingers duck