this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
690 points (98.3% liked)

Games

16729 readers
646 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] agentshags@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Does anyone know if you had to have played the first two games to understand the story? Or is it standalone, or do they catch you up on lore?

[–] Maolmi@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As someone who has played BG1 and 2 and is now 21 hours in the game ... so far there are no references. But the story, the worldbuilding and the characters are sooo gloriously brilliant

[–] agentshags@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So it's kind of standalone then? I might just have to pick it up! It sounds really cool, only based on Lemmy comments I have read

[–] ikapoz@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

It’s very standalone. It’s based in the forgotten realms universe in terms of lore, so it has a ton of depth there. The actual story arc though seems totally unconnected to the previous ones at least ten hours or so in.

load more comments (3 replies)