I think this decentralization and federation is what web3 is all about, without all the corporations calling everything to do with monkey pixel art that costs a million dollars "web3"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] kiriakos@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (8 children)

That's fine, as long as no instance gets like 99% of the userbase and we are back to square one

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

That's my concern - that some company buys up some of the most popular instances, then "encourages" their members to concentrate on just one instance, builds up the number of communities on it until it becomes totally dominant and then cuts out all the other instances.

Not that the others couldn't just continue, obviously, but if they're starved of users they'll be starved of content too and the gravitational pull of the big one(s) might drive the small ones into obscurity or closure.

BRB, got a business idea...

[–] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's exactly what Apple, Google, and Facebook did to XMPP. They all started with a federated open protocol messaging system. At first iChat users could talk to GChat, and Messenger users, as well as users of thousands of other servers. After they built their network they closed off federation under the guise of "feature development".

To this day, iMessage still uses an XMPP based backend. But green text is for Apple users only!

[–] mobiuscoffee@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Something poetic about Facebook dropping xmpp and now coming back to mastodon

I can totally see the big 5 trying to the same things with activitypub

load more comments (5 replies)