this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1604 readers
131 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The killer's face isn't visible in the February 14 footage, so Clearview couldn't identify them.

Undeterred, the cops used Clearview's facial recognition to identify a person in separate video surveillance captured days later on February 20, 2024. The US city's police themselves figured that person, on the basis of his clothing and the way he walked, may be the shooter in the February 14 footage, and obtained a search warrant against the computer-identified man.

Source

So their whole case is that some dude walking down the street days later looked kinda like the guy. They have no other evidence to link him to the crime, other than a gun "officers believe is the murder weapon". The cops deserve to get laughed out of court and publicly humiliated for this.

[–] sc_griffith@awful.systems 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

So their whole case is that some dude walking down the street days later looked kinda like the guy.

it's even worse than that... their case is that the arrestee, dude A, kinda looks like a dude B who was walking down the street days later, and dude B's clothes kinda look like the clothes of a dude C who shot someone

load more comments (1 replies)