this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
6 points (100.0% liked)
Climate
9 readers
1 users here now
Discussion of global heating, Climate and related issues of mitigation. Other active communities: !climate@slrpnk.net (climate@slrpnk.net) !climatecrisis@lemmy.ml (climatecrisis@lemmy.ml) ClimateAnxietySupport - * Manage your grief.
- * Work to Empower your local community
- * Find viable technical solutions that could work within a context of systemic change General News US News Science
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For somepeople surely.
But many people must eat meat.
If you can stop then stop. If anyone can’t then we will figure a solution.
Most can but won’t. This is the issue. Not the other way around.
A less divisive goal of reducing your consumption is a good first step to get mental uptake. People are not ready to be told to stop entirely. If we could set a goal to reduce our consumption by 50% that would an awesome start.
I think that we are way past that, but to anyone their opinion. Now please take in consideration the comment I'm replying to and try to understand that the issue is not that some people can't stop eating animal product, but that most that can won't. Plain and simple.
We are in the climate magazine. In all place on kbin, here we should be aware of fallacies and on what contribute to climate change. Animal products consumption contributes a lot. It's time to stop it when you can, not reduce. Let's the other climate deniers reduce...
Please have more courage than your politicians. Facts are facts.
Cool, let them enjoy the megafires then. That's the dessert which comes with the main dish of meat.