this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1247 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

34912 readers
131 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The awesome Taylor Lorenz reports this on Mastadon. Highly recommend to follow her if you like these updates about what's going on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nortorc@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Not that it isn't fun to laugh at what a boondoggle ~~Twitter~~ X is, but why do you need a permit to change a sign on a building?

[–] mister_flibble@lemm.ee 75 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Guessing less about the sign itself and more about the heavy equipment/traffic obstruction involved in getting it down.

[–] venusenvy47@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also possibly becathe doesn't own the building and needs approval of the owner.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Owners don't issue permits, the government does.

But owners would probably call the police to stop the illegal work from being done to their building. They don't want the liability. This would be reasonable to be part of an approval process with the building owners as you'd likely need their signature with the city, not just twitters.

[–] venusenvy47@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Agreed. But the owner of the building would presumably be able to control modifications of his own building.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)