this post was submitted on 04 Nov 2024
247 points (97.7% liked)
hopeposting
817 readers
329 users here now
Proof of the indomitable human spirit.
Rules:
- Posts must inspire hope or highlight the beauty of existence
- Posts and comments harassing or antagonizing a real person will be removed
- Posts mentioning religious topics are allowed but religion should not be the main point of the post. E.g. “God’s beautiful world” is fine because of the “beautiful world” part, but “God loves you” isn’t because religion is the focal point
- Posts and comments judging group of people in negative way based on stereotype will be removed.
- No posts with toxic positivity. All human emotions are valid.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Some people have an interpretation that the devil wins anyway, either because of the sin of pride or because Johnny is gambling with his immortal soul.
That's not in keeping with hopeposting though, so let me offer an alternative interpretation.
The devil sees this good ol' boy playing fiddle in the woods and thinks he's an easy mark. He proposes the wager, and then in true devilish fashion immediately cheats.
Johnny's unbothered by this. He's just that good, and he schools the devil through skill alone.
Johnny's a force for wholesomeness. He's just happy to be sawing away at the fiddle in the woods, singing songs about chickens and petting dogs. He's talented, but he's also incorruptible.
Because of this, the devil can't swindle him. He truly is a good ol' boy. And when you think about it, wager or not, there's nothing damnable about playing good tunes.
Usually in these Faustian tales, the devil offers a wicked person a bargain, and then that person uses the bargain to perform more wickedness. I posit that the devil doesn't win souls just because of the contract, but because the person damns themselves through their actions after the deal is struck.
If Johnny was a wicked person, maybe he'd waste the golden fiddle on hookers and blow and end up damned anyway. But Johnny doesn't seem like that guy. He probably keeps the gold fiddle on the mantle to tell the tale of his jam session. There's nothing wicked about that, so Johnny is safe
Assuming a typical fiddle weighs 400g and was made from wood with density of 0.8g/ml, the same fiddle made from gold would weigh~9.5kg though it could be lighter as the walls could be made thinner if made from gold sheet i would imagine
Since when is gold a better structural material than wood?
Well as a structural material gold is not good due to most metals being better in every way but for example gold has a tensile strenght of 120MPa while for wood 120MPa seems to be the upper limit after a bit of googling(varies wildly by species, density, moisture and perhaps most importantly grain orientation) so in the context of a same size/thickness etc violin i would wager that the gold one would be quite bit harder to break than the wooden one
The problem is not that either breaks, it is that gold will simply yield (deform permanently) easily. Note that 120 MPa is for volume (cross section), where gold is indeed slightly better (I assumed it would be worse).
However, if you make it thinner than the wood reference, the stress goes up, quickly making it weaker than the wood reference. On a side note, per weight the relevant value is the [en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/specific_strenght](specific strength), where you will find wood way above copper, which is about like gold. Pine wood is even above most alloys because of its low density.