this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
18 points (95.0% liked)

Programming.dev Meta

2468 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Programming.Dev meta community!

This is a community for discussing things about programming.dev itself. Things like announcements, site help posts, site questions, etc. are all welcome here.

Links

Credits

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since the last update, it's not possible to get the !data_structures@programming.dev community page to even load. Can anyone take a look at the problem?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (8 children)

I just checked the status of communities such as !data_structures@programming.dev.

They are still fucked.

I understand not everyone can be a pro or spare time from their personal life to fix problems they barely had time to create to begin with.

But the truth of the matter is that programming.dev is proving itself to be unusable.

Just to think that not so long ago Lemmy was being portrayed as a Reddit alternative.

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Hello,

As suggested elsewhere in the thread, you might consider opening an alt on Lemmy.zip, it's a stable and well managed instance.

Exporting and importing settings takes a few clicks.

[–] lysdexic@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Blaze@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Very proactive admins, they regularly publish this kind of reports: https://lemmy.zip/post/25516571?scrollToComments=true

Good uptime: https://status.lemmy.zip/status/lemmy

Alternative front ends

  • m.lemmy.zip - Our Mobile/Tablet site
  • old.lemmy.zip - A familiar desktop experience!
  • a.lemmy.zip - A desktop-first UI
  • t.lemmy.zip - An alternative Mobile/Tablet UI with lots of features!

High number of active users (491 per month)

Detailed federation status page: https://grafana.lemmy.zip/public-dashboards/bac0acae9cd942f88a65b1a7c94503d2?orgId=1&refresh=1m

load more comments (5 replies)