this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
53 points (94.9% liked)

Economy

431 readers
176 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

there can't be a sadder looking culinary abomination than a fucking big mac

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I can tell that’s an old photo based upon how thick those beef patties are. Recently had a Big Mac and it was paper thin. Easily half that.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Haven't they always been tenth pound patties?

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I see a lot of people saying it has always been that size. I cannot find official documentation.

I’m comparing that photo to this, which is what mine looked exactly like: https://www.reddit.com/r/shrinkflation/comments/15imuxv/grand_big_mac_super_thin_meat/#lightbox

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You can see it in their pricing, if the big Mac contained more than 1/5lb of meat it would throw off the value of the other menu items.

[–] MacAttak8@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I totally follow you there. I don’t disagree with you.

All I am relying on is my personal experience with Big Macs, which used to be a lot.

These new ones are not as thick as they used to be. Different beef cooks differently, different fat percentages for example.

Also, I guarantee all those frozen patties do not weigh the same. Even if they can convince regulators that they average out to the advertised weight.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)