this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
721 points (98.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

213 readers
449 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' etc.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (12 children)

It is ridiculous that assistance programs are all or nothing. No, it is moronic. It damn near acheives the opposite of its intended purpose, to be a safety net or lift up so people can get back on their feet and prosper. Instead, it incentivizes people to remain poor if they can't manage a big enough jump in income to make up for the loss of assistance. You can pick up an extra shift here and there, or get a modest raise, and end up LOSING income as a result. That's absurd.

Those programs should gradually taper such that when you make more income at work, you always also still net more income overall. Past a certain point, instead of dropping to nothing, the assistance lowers gradually the more you make from other income. Progress is a bit slowed that way, but it is still progress, not a pit.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The purpose of a system is what it does

[–] MutilationWave@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

If a fisherman is paid to catch fish, and a dolphin gets caught in the net and dies, is the fisherman's purpose to kill dolphins?

[–] smoker@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Once the rules of a system are set, everything that follows is inevitable.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)