this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
112 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

8573 readers
378 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 17 points 1 month ago (9 children)

It's not just price, at least for me.

It's also the fact that FSR is worse than DLSS, that AMF is worse than nvenc, that their raytracing performance is not even close, and that AFMF isn't as good as DLSS frame generation, and that the drivers aren't as stable, and so on and so on and so on....

The whole product is just... not strictly equivalent, and the price difference isn't the reason that I don't really look too hard at AMD cards.

If AMD gets to equivalency with FSR, AMF, and AFMF that'd make their cards FAR more compelling than a $100 lower price tag would.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

But consider that if you get a more powerful card at the same price you don't need as much upscaling or frame generation. FSR being sightly worse is irrelevant if you can run the game at native.

AMF being worse than NVENC is certainly true, but in my opinion that barely matters. If you care about quality you should use CPU encoding no matter which one you have, and if you just want to capture video locally you can crank up the bitrate where the differences become negligible.

As for ray tracing there's no counter argument there. Nvidia is better, AMD doesn't match them. If you want to do anything with heavy ray tracing AMD is basically a non-starter. Though I do think it's adequate for games with light ray tracing.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don’t now AMDs encoding is pretty bad.

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Their AVC encoding is pretty bad, yes. Simple solution there if you have an AMD card: Don't use it.

If you're streaming use x264, it'll look better than either AMD or Nvidia hardware encoding at streaming bitrates. If you're recording locally use HEVC or AV1 which AMD does much better with than AVC.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)