this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
629 points (97.9% liked)

linuxmemes

21272 readers
424 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

    Everything should be date-based name releases.

    If it’s released April, 2023 it should be 23.04 or similar.

    Other schemes are arbitrary.

    Change my mind.

    [–] Araozu@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Marketing version (23.04 or just 23) and semver (3.11.3)

    Change my mind

    [–] bjornp_@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

    I'm partial to semver where it makes sense and date based releases where it doesn't. At my work we use .. like 2023.7.v2 for template releases but semver for apps with APIs and such

    load more comments (17 replies)