this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
896 points (97.6% liked)

Games

32534 readers
1478 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Inspired by true events from this morning

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Road_Warrior_10@lemmy.world 180 points 1 month ago (29 children)

For context: I make indie games and have released two so far and I'm currently working on the third one which is weird as fuck. So the way that Steam works is, they don't send you money anytime you make a sale, but they send all of it at the end of every month. Now September is almost over and I got an e-mail titled "Steam Payment Notification" and I get all hyped up. I open it and read it that the Payment Notification is actually that there is no Payment since I didn't make $100 in sales. Way to hype me up and bring me down, Steam.

[–] Zoot_@lemm.ee 81 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Youtube and twitch work this same way. When I was starting there were months where I didnt make any money because I didn't meet the minimum. Hoping next month meets the requirement for you boss 🙏

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Does the balance at least accumulate until you do hit the threshold, or is the money just gone?

[–] Zoot_@lemm.ee 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It accumulates, so there is no money lost. It does kinda suck though that as you start, even though you can make money and did make a bit you don't get to see it yet

[–] Halosheep@lemm.ee 27 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It does make sense from a payment processing standpoint. It doesn't make sense to spend more money on creating the transaction than is actually being sent.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I used to pay a particular company by purchase order for this exact reason. CC takes 2-3% of the payment, but purchase order - they've got to get themselves into the company system, track the PO, invoice, track the payment...at the time, a common estimate was $50 to process a PO, and if you're only buying $100 batches, that's a big hit. Did not like that company, but they were the only place to get whatever it was I had to buy.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sending a simple transaction like this costs a couple cents though, which they could in theory bill to the developer as well. Setting the threshold at 100 is probably more to accrue additional interest on Steams bank accounts.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I think in the US I’ve heard ETF/ACH transaction fees are usually around $2.50? It might be possible to have that apply across a batch, though, as in if you submit 10 payments to 10 different people as a single transaction it’s still just $2.50, or 25¢ per person. I’m only getting this from hearing accountants complain at companies I’ve worked with, so I don’t understand the details. But I’ve seen it pretty common with companies doing payouts to want to see a minimum amount before they actually send the payment, otherwise it’s not worth doing.

[–] Zoot_@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Absolutely. It's got to be the way it is. Just kinda feels bad at first

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)